% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Mller:349744,
author = {Müller, Julian},
othercontributors = {Denig, Achim},
title = {{M}easurement of the electromagnetic form factors of the
proton via elastic scattering in the {Q}$^2$ range from 0.5
to 2 ({G}e{V}/c)$^2$},
school = {Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz},
type = {Dissertation},
reportid = {GSI-2024-00487},
pages = {137 p.},
year = {2024},
note = {Dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 2023},
abstract = {The electric and magnetic form factor of the proton are
connected to the distributionof electric charge and electric
current inside the proton. As a fundamentalproperty of the
proton, the knowledge of the form factors therefore allows
to gaininsight into the structure of the proton. The form
factors are accessible in elasticelectron-proton scattering
experiments, which have been performed since the1950s. One
distinguishes two types of experiments, the scattering with
polarizedand unpolarized electrons. Around the turn of the
millennium, it was found thatthere is a discrepancy in the
electric to magnetic form factor ratio of the
protonGE(Q2)/GM(Q2), when comparing the results of both
methods. According to thedata from polarization experiments,
the ratio follows a linear decreasing trend withincreasing
momentum transfer Q2, whereas the ratio measured in
unpolarized scatteringremains roughly constant. The commonly
assumed explanation for this discrepancyis the contribution
of the two photon exchange (TPE) to the scatteringprocess,
which has a different influence on polarized and unpolarized
scattering.To investigate the discrepancy in the form factor
ratio and the influence of the TPE,new unpolarized elastic
electron-proton scattering data were measured at the
MainzMicrotron MAMI and the 3-spectrometer-facility of the
A1 collaboration. The datawere taken at seven beam energies
between 720MeV and 1508MeV to cover the Q2region from 0.5
(GeV/c)2 to 2 (GeV/c)2. The new data extends an already
existingdata set from an earlier measurement in 2010. In
total, the MAMI data set nowconsists of 1676 cross section
points in the Q2 range between 0.004 (GeV/c)2 and2 (GeV/c)2.
The measured cross sections were corrected for radiative
processes byutilizing an extensive simulation, which
calculates the radiative corrections for eachevent. Instead
of using the classical Rosenbluth technique, the MAMI data
set wasanalyzed via a direct fit of a form factor model to
the cross section data to separatethe form factors. The
fitting procedure was also used to determine the
normalizationof the data, however, the fit proved to have
stability issues for the data at higherbeam energies. The
inclusion of external data from previous unpolarized
experimentsprovided the stability needed for the fit and an
excellent agreement betweenthe two parts of the MAMI data
set could be demonstrated. Two different modelsfor the TPE
correction were applied to the data before the fit, to
investigate by howmuch the contribution shifts the form
factors. The extracted form factor ratio fromthe fit was
compared to the data from polarization experiments.The
results showed that the MAMI data produce a linear
decreasing form factorratio, independently of the applied
TPE model. This trend has not been observedin previous
unpolarized experiments. An overall lower electric to
magnetic formfactor ratio in unpolarized electron-proton
scattering could play an important rolein solving the
discrepancy between polarized and unpolarized experiments.},
cin = {MSF},
cid = {I:(DE-Ds200)MSF-20150313OR331},
pnm = {612 - Cosmic Matter in the Laboratory (POF4-612)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-612},
experiment = {$EXP:(DE-Ds200)External_experiment-20200803$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
urn = {urn:nbn:de:hebis:77-openscience-d78516b5-91aa-48aa-8158-5cce33f00e122},
url = {https://repository.gsi.de/record/349744},
}