% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INPROCEEDINGS{Neuhaus:364060,
      author       = {Neuhaus, Simon and Shiroya, Mehulkumar and Singh, Omveer
                      and Dahm, Patrick},
      title        = {{E}xperiences from the {CBM} collaboration: {CAD} to {ROOT}
                      conversion for {D}etector {G}eometries},
      journal      = {The European physical journal / Web of Conferences},
      volume       = {337},
      issn         = {2100-014X},
      address      = {Les Ulis},
      publisher    = {EDP Sciences},
      reportid     = {GSI-2026-00240},
      pages        = {01268},
      year         = {2025},
      note         = {This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms
                      of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0},
      abstract     = {Fully automated conversion from CAD geometries directly
                      into their ROOT geometry equivalents is a topic of wide
                      interest in particle physics experiment communities for some
                      time. Tessellation of the surface of an intricate geometry
                      is a powerful approach towards this goal, by potentially
                      providing a shared geometrical representation with very good
                      convergence even for the case of complex geometries.
                      However, using tessellated geometries also requires
                      significant computational effort for particle tracking
                      inside and through tessellated objects.In this paper, we
                      first discuss the experiment and the methodology involved in
                      tessellation and conversion. We report on the application
                      and first experience of using two different software
                      approaches. The two tools, VecGeom and TGeoArbN, were used
                      for simulation of the same tessellated subdetector
                      component. Our observations in this simulation with respect
                      to obtained results and simulation speed are reported along
                      with our general observation about the handling of these
                      tools.},
      month         = {Oct},
      date          = {2024-10-21},
      organization  = {27th International Conference on
                       Computing in High Energy and Nuclear
                       Physics (CHEP 2024), Krakow (Poland),
                       21 Oct 2024 - 25 Oct 2024},
      cin          = {CBM / CBM@FAIR},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Ds200)CBM-20080821OR102 / I:(DE-Ds200)Coll-FAIR-CBM},
      pnm          = {612 - Cosmic Matter in the Laboratory (POF4-612)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-612},
      experiment   = {$EXP:(DE-Ds200)External_experiment-20200803$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16 / PUB:(DE-HGF)8},
      doi          = {10.1051/epjconf/202533701268},
      url          = {https://repository.gsi.de/record/364060},
}